Is the Patriot Act being used in Boston Marathon bombing investigation?

Just before 11 a.m. Wednesday morning, CNN reported an arrest had been made in the Boston Marathon Bombing.

Their report was quickly backed up by several other news outlets, including the Boston Globe and a local Boston TV station.

As of this writing, the Boston Globe still says a suspect is in "custody."

Notice the difference between the two words "arrest" and "custody." There's an interesting distinction between the two.

Since the Patriot Act was passed, the definitions of each word in relation to police activity has changed. The police are now allowed to hold a suspect in terrorism (which the Boston bombing is) related cases in "custody" prior to "arresting" him.

The Patriot Act, as I understand it, allows for the indefinite detention of terrorism suspects. So is it possible that CNN was right and they just reported the wrong word? Maybe.

Let me further explain. Notice this: The Boston Police and the U.S. Justice Department took to Twitter to say no one has been "arrested." But, neither said whether a suspect was being held in "custody." Make no mistake, the FBI will use every legal tool in their shed during this investigation including holding someone in "custody" before they "arrest" him.

Imagine it like a hit drama. The police swoop into a house, take the suspect into custody and lock him up in a room. In that room they are playing good cop and bad cop to try and get information out of him before the suspect lawyers up. This is all legal pending court challenges.

Clearly, this is all speculation on my part. But semantics matter, especially to lawyers. Arrest is the much more official process preceding official charges.

It is still highly possible CNN and the Boston media all got the story wrong. It's possible their sources misled them or gave them faulty information, but, at one point, the Associated Press reported a suspect had been arrested, handed over to the U.S. Marshalls and they were headed to the federal courthouse in Boston. That's a pretty specific detail to get wrong.

I'm saying there is a conspiracy out there just looking at the difference between "arrest" and "custody." The difference, according to the police, is significant. The police could be questioning "someone of interest" about the bombings based on video footage around the marathon. This could be where the Patriot Act could come in. Just look up what happened to Jose Padilla.

Of course, the reality could be the FBI is just starting their investigation and have just started identifying those "people of interest."

6 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Solitaire wrote...
    SAD
    Now we know what a crowd does.
  • Abuse
    2cents wrote...
    There is an unfolding discovery . . .
    involving our Commander-In-Chief, that is very, very, very, very intriguing. It involves how the US quickly whisked away their suspect back to the safety of his Saudi home, after an April 17 off-the-schedule meeting between President Obama and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal. Of course those covert maneuvers required postponement of announcements that you and we all await. It takes time to clean the stage and get the script right.
  • Abuse
    OneWonders wrote...
    Where did you get
    that from 2cents?
    Equal Justice, Not Social Justice.
  • Abuse
    MolonLabe wrote...
    here you go...
    http://www.infowars.com/obama-covering-up-saudi-link-to-boston-bombing/
  • Abuse
    OneWonders wrote...
    Very Interesting
    Thanks for the link.
    Equal Justice, Not Social Justice.
  • Abuse
    JonF wrote...
    Lol @ Infowars...
    ...being cited as credible news source.
Home | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Copyright Policy | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Contest Rules | Employment Opportunities | EEO Public File Report
Copyright 2014 Bonneville International. All rights reserved.