Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
AP: c42e4c01-ecda-4315-bcb2-592ece8da078
Arizona Cardinals' Calais Campbell (93) and Patrick Peterson (21) celebrate the final offensive play for the San Francisco 49ers during the fourth quarter in an NFL football game, Sunday, Dec. 11, 2011, in Glendale, Ariz. The Cardinals defeated the 49ers 21-19.(AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
"Playoffs? You want to talk about playoffs? You kiddin' me? Playoffs? I just hope we can win a game." - Jim Mora, coach of the Indianapolis Colts, November 25, 2001 after a loss to the San Francisco 49ers.

After the Arizona Cardinals blew a 21-point lead and lost to the Baltimore Ravens on October 30th to fall to a woeful 1-6, I bet a lot of you started feeling a lot like Jim Mora did ten years ago -- just hoping the Birds would win another game.

On Halloween, there was talk of the Cardinals' hat being thrown into the "Suck for Luck" sweepstakes. Two weeks before Christmas, that talk has shifted to hope for a playoff run.

Ken Whisenhunt's team has won three straight and five of their last six to improve their record to 6-7 with three games to play. Maybe it's the holiday egg nog talking, but all three of the remaining games on their schedule -- home vs. Cleveland, at Cincinnati and home against Seattle--are infinitely winnable. Is 9-7 out of the question?

No.

Is it unlikely?

Maybe. But at least there's a chance.

The Cardinals defense has, at the very least, reached a comfort level with new coordinator Ray Horton's defense. More accurately, they're playing winning football. Sunday's victim, the NFC West champion San Francisco 49ers, ran headfirst into a big red brick wall after halftime during the Cardinals' 21-19 win. In the 2nd half, the 49ers had 78 yards of offense, and 37 of it came on a touchdown run by Frank Gore. That was the only play the Niners ran in Arizona territory in the 2nd half.

Other than that, San Francisco had 41 yards and two first downs in the game's final 30 minutes.

The Cardinals' defense stiffened in the red zone, holding the 49ers to three field goal attempts in their three trips inside the 20-yard line.

Offensively, Arizona is doing just enough to win -- they haven't scored more than 23 points in any of their last five wins -- and quarterback John Skelton has been the poster boy for that. Pressed into duty early in the game for an injured Kevin Kolb, Skelton had his typical up-and-down performance. There were the highs of his touchdown passes to Early Doucet, Larry Fitzgerald and Andre Roberts and there were the lows of his three turnovers.

But somehow, with a defense that prevents teams from getting into the endzone, Skelton overcomes his wrongdoings and wills this team to wins. He's kind of like a mini-Tebow, without all the kneeling and hype.

After the Cardinals fell behind 19-7 early in the third, Skelton went on to complete 14 of his 17 passes for 195 yards and two touchdowns in helping construct the comeback. That's a QB rating of 129.17. He makes plays with his feet, he shakes off tacklers, and he does a lot of the little things that help a team win.

But, much like Tebow, I bet you cringed at least once while watching Skelton play on Sunday. I know I did.

"You guys stuck a fork in us quite a while ago, you know," Whisenhunt said following the win over the 49ers. "Our guys never let it get to them."

And for that, Whisenhunt and the rest of the Cardinals deserve credit. Plenty of times in their history, we've seen Cardinals teams get off to a bad start and coast the rest of the season. That's not happening this year.

Will these Cardinals join the 1970 Cincinnati Bengals as the only teams in NFL history to qualify for the playoffs after stumbling to a 1-6 record? That remains to be seen.

But they're in position to at least avoid a losing season for only the 6th time in the 24 years since they moved to the Valley.

And even if that improbable quest for a playoff spot falls short, they're planting the seeds for 2012 and beyond.

11 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    AZSPORTFAN wrote...
    Nice Article Vince
    It's funny how the national media won't give the Cardinals credit for the win. According to them the 9er's had a meltdown or just didn't care enough because they already won the west. They won't even mention how our defense has only allowed 6 touchdowns in the last six games. As of today I'm completely happy with the way the Cardinals are coming along....... A playoff spot would be nice but just to see them play with everything they have gives us some hope of what next year will be like.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    Offensively, Arizona is doing just enough to win
    Next year, they need to do better than doing enough to win. They should resign Campbell and figure out our QB situation. In my opinion, we have 2 quarterbacks that can probably be developed into very good quarterbacks. The development lies on the coaches and the QB's themselves. But I am excited to see all these young parts come together and start gelling. IF WE GET OFF TO A GOOD START NEXT YEAR IM SURE WE WILL MAKE THE PLAYOFFS.
  • Abuse
    John B. wrote...
    'next year'
    hahaha these two comments sound like us Browns fans... "we'll get'em next year!"
  • Abuse
    mdwilliams1967 wrote...
    'next year'
    Hey, John B. There is one major difference between us Cards fans and you Browns fans when we talk about 'next year'...and that is that our Cards team actually has a talented nucleus to make it happen. Good luck with that! I'll see you at U of P on the 18th to watch the Browns get their BEAT DOWN!
  • Abuse
    sundevil7901 wrote...
    I agree
    No reason to hold back on the kool-aid at this point. Playoffs or bust, baby!
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    Tie breaker situation?
    Anyone know the current tie breaker situation for the Cards? I know they hold the breaker over Dallas, while NY hold it over the cards, but not sure who has the breaker if the cards tie with the bears, lions, or falcons. Currently seattle also holds our breaker, but we play them again in the season finale anyway. I think it comes down to conf record which currently we lose out the falcons and bears, and only tie with the Lions. I don't see us catching the falcons anyway, but if the Lions lose to the pack and we beat seattle, we'll have the edge there I believe, correct?
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    So to sum up
    Assuming we win out, regardless of what they do in the next two games, if NY beats dallas in the season finale, at worst we'll be tied with dallas and beat them out anyway via tie breaker. If the Lions finish the year 1-2, with one of their losses being to their only remaining conf game against the pack, we'll be tied and beat them out via better conf record. If the bears go 2-1, we'll be tied and they'll have the better conf so they'll beat us out so we need them to go at best 1-2 so we can avoid a tie. If the falcons go 1-2 we tie, and ...
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    sum up continued...
    if both losses were to tampa and NO, we win tie break, else we're at a tie there too and we move into the next tier of tie breaks which I'm not familiar with. Pretty much, we need to win out and either the bears and lions, bears and falcons, or lions and falcons, to finish 1-2 (or worse) and either NY to beat dallas in the season finale, or either of them to finish the season 1-2. Based on schedule and injuries, I could easily see the bears and lions going 1-2 and NY beating dallas again, so this really isn't quite as impossible as it seems, we've just gotta win our games to have a shot.
  • Abuse
    benjicardsfan11 wrote...
    Re: Quarterbacking
    I think the quarterbacks are fine. It's more of the need for legit left and right tackles on the o-line. With an upgraded o-line and drafting another wide receiver (tall and athletic). Then this offense is good to go.
  • Abuse
    benjicardsfan11 wrote...
    Re: Playoffs
    It would be awesome to see the Cards face the 49ers in the playoffs and beat them out!
close

Share: