Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
The Cardinals relieved QB coach Chris Miller of his duties a couple weeks ago, and while there appears to be no favorite to replace him, some big-time names have popped up as candidates.

It was reported last week that former Cards OC and Chiefs HC Todd Haley could get the job, and late Sunday NFL insider Charley Casserly -- he of Peyton Manning to Arizona fame -- provided a new name for who could be the future Hall of Famer's next coach.

Jackson led the Raiders to an 8-8 record this season, a mark that was apparently not good enough to keep his job.

Prior to becoming the head coach at Oakland Jackson was the team's offensive coordinator, and before that he was the QB coach for the Baltimore Ravens, tutoring rookie Joe Flacco to a solid season and AFC Championship berth.

Of course like Haley, one would think Jackson would have better options available than joining a team as its QB coach, as that would be quite a drop after being a head coach the year before.

2 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    theuglytruth wrote...
    Whiz..
    ...loyal to a fault. Haley>Miller...that is obvious. It would seem that in the business of football you give your team the best chance to win. The Cards have a failing grade regarding 1st downs and 3rd down conversions. Clearly, the defense showed up mid-season...but the offense stayed flat. Miller has a ton to prove very quickly if they stick with him because his playcalling left a lot left to be desired. This is a key moment in the Cards offensive success, the wrong decision will certainly show its face early.
  • Abuse
    Richemor wrote...
    I luv
    How wishy washy Warner is on his analysis of the whiz/cards system and kolb not fitting... well your telling me you changed thier minds to play to your skill and it was your Offense.. and you talk smack bout Kolb and how he doesnt fit the Whiz system. Why not come out for your botheren and say this staff needs to play to thier stengths
close

Share: