Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Herm Edwards used to be an NFL head coach, leading both the New York Jets and Kansas City Chiefs to a good amount of success.

Now an analyst for ESPN, Edwards spends his time discussing the league, chatting with rookies, and playing to win the game.

OK, maybe not the last part, even if that's what one always does.

Anyway, in a piece for ESPN Insider, Edwards ranked the NFL's 32 head coaches and separated them by tier.

Arizona Cardinals coach Ken Whisenhunt ranked 15th, and was placed in the "Ascending" group.

A former NFL tight end and Steelers offensive coordinator, Ken knows what he wants to do on offense. He wants to minimize mistakes and be balanced between the run and pass. Being a former player, the players respect him. He's seen it all. Players love honesty and consistency, and he's brought both to the Cardinals' organization -- one that hasn't had a lot of success or excitement in the past.

His overall record doesn't really reflect the job he's done turning around that team. Although he rode the hot hand of Kurt Warner to a Super Bowl appearance, his biggest issue is that he's never had a franchise QB to work with -- and it doesn't look like one is on the roster right now. His future in Arizona is dependent on whether John Skelton or Kevin Kolb turns into a reliable starter. He's also struggled with his defense, but Ray Horton will help him this year.

Few would have argued the idea that Whisenhunt was one of the game's better coaches a few years ago, as he guided the Cardinals to a pair of NFC West titles and an appearance in the Super Bowl.

A couple of down years, though, combined with a seeming inability to get a handle on the quarterback position have led to Whiz losing some of his luster, as questions are starting to pop up regarding his future in the desert.

Joining Whisenhunt as an ascending coach is the 49ers' Jim Harbaugh, and Arizona's coach ranks ahead of the Seahawks' Pete Carroll but behind the Rams' Jeff Fisher.

15 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    bonedoc wrote...
    In Whiz We Trust
    Everyone who bashes Whiz on these message boards just doesn't remember how BAD it was before he got here. I am a season ticket holder since the Cards got here in 1986. Since Gene Stallings, I can't recall anyone who has improved the image and attitude of our team like Whiz. He has an even keel through rough waters - not many coaches would have ended last season 8-8. He only has 1 losing season since arriving here! Compare that to the nonsense we lived through for decades before. Go Whiz, and Go Cards.
  • Abuse
    hugUhbear wrote...
    I am a fan with passion, sometimes I criticize
    Whiz because I have my opinion and it differs occasionally from where Whiz stands (see his stance RE: Russ Grimm) or appears to stand. However, I whole heartedly agree that Whiz has been a big help to this franchise and its legitimacy. I also see that he has been the right man/coach for this team when they desperately needed it. Whiz is a good coach and I really hope he can survive the constant quarterback controversies that have dogged him for three years. That issue is a threat to any coach as it should be. We will see if Whiz can overcome it.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    I agree with Herm Edwards.
    I agree with bonedoc. And I agree with huguhbear. Since losing Kurt Warner, while Im watching games, I find myself questioning his calls, questioning his approach in that game situation, and questioning how he's preparing his offense for gameday. Let's not beat around the bush, this offense has played horribly, since losing Kurt. OBVIOUSLY, losing the HOF QB is the main reason of that. I dont think any QB on this roster is capable of being good.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    I agree with Herm Edwards 2.
    We keep going back as to why. ITS BCUZ OF THE OFFENSIVE LINE. You would think, a coach of Whiz's caliber, would have that fixed by now, considering his offensive background. I am really sorry you guys! But gee whiz... Games are won and lost in the trenches. I was taught that from pee wee to high school, and, its even preached religuously in the college and pro levels. Doesnt matter if you have HOF QB, if you dont have protection, you lose. In Warner's last game as a Cardinal vs the Saints, he didnt get the protection he needed from the line or the play calling (keeping in a TE or RB).
  • Abuse
    thorjeremy501 wrote...
    Whiz is our only hope!
    Before Whiz AZ was a washup losing franchise. Now he is turning things around and rather quickly I might add. It seems like AZ has a winning attitude now, were before the season seemed over by week four. With the exception of 2010 .500 or better and in the playoff picture until at least week 14. Why would any true AZ fan want him fired? So we can go back to mediocrity or start worrying about next years draft after week 4? The season has not even began yet and people are ready to call for his firing.
  • Abuse
    CroDawg wrote...
    I like Whiz
    but he is not the only hope for AZ. He has put this organization in a position where his predecesor will be able to take over and improve where necessary. I don't want Whiz to go, but I do want him to build a line and tailor a scheme to fit his QB's. Never put a professional athlete or coach on a pedestal. He can be fired as fast as Jim Mora. It's how the NFL works.
  • Abuse
    Think4URself wrote...
    Too often they speak of Head Coaches
    ...when they should be talking about GMs. The Cards GM has a very thin resume at best (football wise). He got lucky with Warner as he only brought him in to push Lame heart, I mean Leinart. And, other than that...his best signing was a Steelers OC, now Head Coach. Which, he is still trying to prove his architecture works. Graves was around when the Cards sucked before the SB and still around today making the same stupid football mistakes. If you want to win, you gotta have a winning frame of mind (W and Ls), not ROI.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    I agree he's changed some things, but
    he's no QB Guru. Whiz has been lucky getting Superbowl QB's. 1st: Big Ben. On that team they had a great defense, Randel El, Ward, Bettis, Parker, Heap, and a good solid O line. Big Ben went on to win another SB without Whiz. That goes to show you how good of a QB he was going to be anyway. Dont kid urself, bcuz Whiz isnt a genious! That team couldve won a SB if I were calling the plays, ok? 2nd: Warner. He's without a doubt HOF product. Hes in a whole other level. Hes a different breed. You cant teach someone to be Warner. Your just born with it...
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    I agree he's changed some things, but (2)
    Warner has a quick release. He had what he needed -3 Pro Bowl recievers. Warner did what he did here without a good O Line and good running game. Whiz hasnt ever re-built a offense from the bottom (O Line) up (QB). This offense doesnt have a identity. He's stuck in passing the ball. He cant run the ball because he doesnt have a good line. Honestly, he needs another year. He needs 2 draft nothing but O Linemen next year in the draft. But, based on his decisions in the Draft & Free Agency post Warner (not picking up O Linemen), you could argue, his coaching ability, seems like its ascended.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    Dont blame the GM
    He's Ken Whizenhunt! He's a freakin offensive genious as far as the Bidwells are concerned. Thats why they hired him. Duh! So dont give me this "ITS ALL THE GM'S FAULT". Thats a boat load of crap! Whiz has a big pull in who they draft and who they can chase in free agency. He's ignored the offensive line and its come back to bite him in the backside. Your never going to hear him admit it. But its the truth. He needs to get some talent on the line. If he seems to think its not the talent, then fire your O Line coach! End of story.
close

Share: