Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
AP: 0192d11c-a1a6-45cb-b39d-04705d179d96
Arizona Cardinals quarterback John Skelton (19) works as Atlanta Falcons defensive end John Abraham (55) pursues during the first half of an NFL football game Sunday, Nov. 18, 2012, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)
Ken Whisenhunt must be coaching for his job.

How else would you explain the decision to name John Skelton the starting quarterback for Sunday's game in Seattle?

"Some of it has to do with Seattle -- playing up there, having played against them once already this year," Whisenhunt said of the move. "There are a lot of factors, but I'm not going into each one of them."

He doesn't have to. We already know.

It was obvious to anyone who watched the Cardinals over the last few weeks that for his many faults, Skelton was then and still is a better option at quarterback than Ryan Lindley.

Skelton has completed just 54.7 percent of his passes this season. Lindley? 48.5.

Skelton has thrown just two touchdown passes against five interceptions. Lindley? Zero touchdown passes and five picks.

The only knock against Lindley is that he's not ready to be an NFL starter right now, which is exactly what one would expect from a quarterback taken in the sixth round of the draft. The blame for Lindley's struggles -- and those of the team with him under center -- falls squarely on the head coach's shoulders, which is why he made the move back to Skelton.

And given reports this week that the Cardinals front office has had some discussions about Ray Horton -- presumably his viability as a Whisenhunt replacement -- it stands to reason the Cardinals head coach is looking at these final four games as a final chance to keep his job.

Really, how many coaches would survive a 12-game losing streak in year six of their tenure?

Even with Skelton under center -- or maybe in part because Skelton is under center -- the possibility of Arizona losing out remains strong. Would one more win be enough to warrant keeping the head coach? How about two? Three or four would have to do it, right?

Who knows. In fact, the decision may have already been made.

But if you're Whisenhunt, the move back to Skelton had to be made.

It would have been impossible to sell his locker room on the idea that Lindley gave them the best chance to win, and continuing to trot the rookie onto the field surely would have been met with frustration from the players and rolling eyes from fans and media alike.

As well as losses.

So Whisenhunt went back to a quarterback he clearly does not believe in in a last ditch effort to save his job.

With the Cardinals' record along with their schedule, it may prove to be too little, too late.

17 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    He's too far gone
    He hasnt lost the locker room fully, but, if they lose this game, he will. Do you think that the players aren't frustrated to a point of doubt? I know we the fans are. I wouldnt give him another year because I dont want to go through another year like the last 3 years.
  • Abuse
    MikeWins wrote...
    So let me get this straight...
    If he keeps Lindley in as the starter he "isn't giving the team the best chance to win," but if he names Skelton the starter its "a last-ditch effort to save his job?" Does anyone else see the impossibility of this situation? The guy doesn't have a QB and is trying to see who can win him a game. Whiz is doing the right thing, Mr. Green just needs a story line and isn't above contradicting himself...
  • Abuse
    theAdamGreen wrote...
    @ MikeWins
    If Whisenhunt was so concerned with what "gives the Cardinals the best chance to win" why did he not only replace Skelton with Lindley against Atlanta, but leave him in the next two weeks when it was obvious the team had no chance with him under center? What happened between the Jets game (where Lindley was terrible) and now to suddenly make the coach believe Skelton gave them the best chance?
  • Abuse
    rdgroce wrote...
    MIKEWINS
    if this was the first QB fiascal than maybe I would somewhat agree with your statement. This is Linehart/Anderson 2.0
  • Abuse
    mesa mad man wrote...
    Skelton
    Regardless of what happens - I think the move to bench Skelton was the right one. It sent a strong message to him and I can only hope that he took that to heart and will return and show some improvement
  • Abuse
    tehQuagmire wrote...
    Agreeing with MikeWins
    A) The front office speaking to Horton is 1- not confirmed, 2- doesn't mean it's for a HC job. They want to keep him and IF they met with him, it could just as easily been for an extention/pay raise. B)Anderson was NOT brought in to be the starter in 2010. Leinart quit so Whiz cut him rather than bench him again & deal with his locker room poison. C) @AdamGreen- Skelton was TebowofAZ last year. Yes he won games but despite him not because of him. It finally caught up with him. Whiz must have seen something in Lindley & thought he would play the way Whiz thought he would (ie 1st qtr of Rams)
  • Abuse
    StubbyJ23 wrote...
    @MikeWins
    Ok so Whiz has tried his best with what he had. Explain the multi season multi game losing streaks over the past 3 years. Seven, six and eight over the past three seasons. After Lindley's first half performance against the Rams he looked good. But his performance against the Jets was down right pathetic. I haven't wanted to turn off a Cardinals game in the first quarter before that day. Whiz should have replaced him with Skelton in the 2nd quarter.
  • Abuse
    Midtsaic wrote...
    here's a thought...
    Maybe he just want's to win, you know like he said. Now that he has seen what he has seen out of Lindley he is going back to the better QB. People need to stop reading into everything.
  • Abuse
    Vinzzini wrote...
    No Win Situation - of his own making
    Whiz created this problem - and should be fired regardless. He negotiated more personnel control after the SuperBowl. He passsed on a number of better QB options and selected all the miserable QBs in his tenure EXCEPT Warner and Leinert. His personnel failures also meant bad picks in the 1st round draft since (Peterson is the 1 exception). Also all the blame aimed at the OC should go to Whiz. Each OC has had to run Whiz' offense and Whiz retained some or all of the play calling. He was the only constant over the last few years. the only year he gave up this control was with Haley & Warner.
  • Abuse
    Vinzzini wrote...
    Catch 22 - that Whiz created! FIRE Him!
    If the Cards go 0-4 to end the season, it is because of Whiz' inability to evaluate, select and develop a QB. Whiz expects Kurt Warner results from 5th & 6th rounders despite no support. If Skelton wins, then it will be SOLELY Whiz' fault that the Cards are not a playoff team. In ATL, he removed a QB coming off a 300 yd game and a tendency to start slowly in games after 7 attempts and 1 terrible pass. Lindley then finished without a single 1st down. Despite 1 good quarter vs the Rams for Lindley, Skelton could have us at 7-5 right now instead of 4-8 because the last 3 were winnable
close

Share: