Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

To deal or to deal.

That is the question the Phoenix Suns are contemplating as the NBA trade deadline approaches on Thursday.

To deal with the Cleveland Cavaliers or to deal with the Miami Heat.

It is a foregone conclusion that the Suns have made the determination that trading Amare Stoudemire is in their best interest.

Now, the difficult part is trying to figure out which team is offering the Suns the best package.

As I have said many many times the Suns have no interest in the Heat's Michael Beasley long term. But Beasley is the only real asset Miami has outside of Dwayne Wade.

What Miami has that may entice Phoenix to deal is two first-round draft picks this year, their own pick and Toronto's pick, and you would have to figure they need to offer both to land Stoudemire. Plus, an expiring contract (Quentin Richardson, Udonis Haslem) that would give the Suns cap flexibility going forward. And Beasley, a player the Suns would move at some point before next season.

The Cavaliers can offer a package of Zydrunas Ilgauskas and his expiring contract, second-year player JJ Hickson and their own first-round pick.

Now, the million dollar question is which package is better. Hickson is a player the Suns would want - he is a 6-9, 240-pound power forward and a freak athletically - but not a good shooter. Ilgauskas can possibly be moved to Philadelphia for Andre Iguodala, waived or he can play the season out walk as a free agent giving the Suns cap flexibility.

Beasley is a player the Suns would move either in another trade deadline deal or in the summer. Miami has two first-round picks that will both be somewhere in the middle of the draft. Cleveland has a first-round pick that will most likely be the last pick of the first round.

Both teams have the expiring contracts that will put the Suns in a great position for the free-agent class of 2011, especially when you consider that Jason Richardson's salary comes off the book that year as well.

Assuming Ilgauskas would not be moved by Phoenix if they acquired him, this trade really comes down to Beasley and what they can get for him in a trade plus two decent first round picks or Hickson and a late first-round pick. I like Hickson over Beasley and Miami's two picks over Cleveland's one.

If the Heat are insisting on only offering one of the picks then the choice is clear - the Cavs offer is better.

If Miami is offering both picks then it's a toss-up.

Either way it looks very much like Amare Stoudemire played his last game in front of fans in Phoenix as a member of the Suns last Wednesday.

22 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    GRANT HILL DRINKS SPRITE wrote...
    miami
    i cant believe anyone is thinking clevelands deal is even close to being as good as miami's. we still get some financial relief once haslem's contract expires. haslem is solid and could plat either pf or center. beasley is low risk because he is on a small contract while having an ENORMOUS amount of upside. if they dont want him still once the season is over then they can explore how to get rid of him. even if we get only one draft pick it will be better than clevelands. hickson is a role player at best. beasley has high potential with low risk!
  • Abuse
    JW L. wrote...
    If these deals are really on the table
    It is a no-brainer to go with Miami, even if there is only 1 pick involved. Whatever you think of Beasley, he is 5 times more valuable to you than Hickson. He can play at a high level and he has decent trade value. Hickson has neither. If the Suns go with the Clev deal, it will be strictly about the money. Kerr and Sarver better think hard about this one because if they choose unwisely it will kill gate receipts, which is a bad thing unless their ultimate goal is to move the franchise to SD.
  • Abuse
    Evan H. wrote...
    Beasly no risk?
    Beasly's risky cause you might have another "incident" like Arenas. The suns will not EVER get Beasly
  • Abuse
    GRANT HILL DRINKS SPRITE wrote...
    yeah no risk
    even if he has an off court incident dont compare him to arenas. arenas was on a HUGE contract while beasley has 2 years remaining with low salary. so if he doesnt pan out, we arent paying him a grip of money anyways.
  • Abuse
    organizedchaos wrote...
    Beasley
    And we better freaking keep himj. Or give it a season at least. Not take him for 2 months and move him in summer. It's just stupid.
  • Abuse
    organizedchaos wrote...
    oh and
    Beasley >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hickson. Like said, 1 pick, or 0 picks. That deal is million times better,
  • Abuse
    Gary B. wrote...
    Are you High Gambo? lol
    Have been a suns fan since day 1.Gambo I wouldn't trade Earl Clark for JJ Hickson.I guarentee you clark would have much better points scored and rebounds if he played for cleveland with 18 to 22 minutes a game.This deal is to save money now..nothing promising for the future.I too will stay home and not go to any of the suns games to save money..The miami deal is 10 times the deal of the cavs.Why would they move Beasley what does he make 4 mill a year.And one of the bright young talents in the league
  • Abuse
    Brent B. wrote...
    What the .......
    Who the heck is talkin bout tradin Earl Clark?..Gary B, I think u need to read the passage from Gambo a couple more times before u reply and sound so stupid.
  • Abuse
    GRANT HILL DRINKS SPRITE wrote...
    ugh
    he's saying he wouldnt even trade earl clark if it got him hickson because hickson is trash.
  • Abuse
    AZSharksfan wrote...
    Miami trade for sure
    Beasley, expiring contracts, and 2 higher first rounders is far superior than the JJ Hickson trade. Miami is reportedly serious about the deal, so see if you can dump J-Rich's horrible contract also. Amare and Richardson for Beasley, O'Neal's huge expiring contract, 2 first rounders and maybe a throw in like Mario Chalmers.
  • Abuse
    esc R. wrote...
    Miami
    trade is better IMO. Don’t think hickson is going to add to much in this league. He is a nice big man, but that is it. In college, he was not as good as advertised. Plus, if the suns do not like Beasley, use him as the former #2 pick and the lesser of Miami’s two picks to move up in the draft to grab a talented player in the top 10. it goes to show what an amazing GM we have here to get these great deals! Maybe we can win the lottery the next 5 years??? A bunch of morons run this orgnization.
  • Abuse
    Evan H. wrote...
    Neither
    neither trade is a good deal for the suns. The suns are in a difficult situation, because they need to trade Amare, or at least make a blockbuster trade to put them in serious contention of knocking off the lakers and winning a championship. The problem is with the Heat trade they will give us 2 draft picks which will help us in the future (2 years or so) when we want to win NOW. We would basically start rebuilding our team if we trade to the heat for draft picks. (READ OTHER COMMENTS BY ME, THIS ONE IS TOO LONG)
  • Abuse
    Evan H. wrote...
    Neither
    The reason I think the cavs trade is also bad is because Amare is worth much more than what they are offering us. Do you really think Ilgauskas and Hickson are worth the trade value of Amare? I dont know much about Hickson, but Ilgauskas is only an AVERAGE player, and I dont think Hickson and him are nearly worth Amare. Can you imagine how trading Amare would help the cavs though... not only does he help them, but that would "Seal the deal" with Lebron in Clevland.
  • Abuse
    Peter L. wrote...
    Amare trade
    Becareful what you wish for. Amare can't be sucessfull without the Suns, and the Suns can't be sucessfull without Amare. They both need to realize this and concentrate on getting a defensive coach to teach them. Keeping this together is their best option.
  • Abuse
    Evan H. wrote...
    Neither
    The point is, the suns do need to make a trade with Amare (They should try to trade Richardson too, I'm not to impressed with him) but they need to look somewhere else. Neither trade is an improvement for the suns. Perhaps they should look to another team to trade him to. Sometimes I feel that Amare has a couple bad games and everybody gets too eager to get him out of here. They look at the first trade they see and automatically decide they should take the deal.
  • Abuse
    Evan H. wrote...
    Neither
    I'm just curious, wouldn't it be possible that the suns could trade for Dwayne Wade? He is not necessarily going to stay in Miami, so why not get "the sure thing" out of him and make a move to have a player stay in Miami for a long period of time, instead of just this year? What if the suns gave them Amare and throw in a draft pick and/or Goran Dragic.
close

Share: