Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
The Phoenix Suns supplied lots of fireworks Wednesday on the most appropriate day of the year.

Things moved fast once they agreed to move Steve Nash to the Lakers, ending an exciting and highly-successful era in Suns basketball.

Here is a breakdown of what transpired with my thoughts on each deal:

Nash to the Lakers in exchange for two first and two second round picks

Look, it sucks that Nash now plays for a bitter rival and will wear purple and gold. But if we are being honest and taking emotion out of it, this was the best deal the Suns could have made.

New York was an option but Steve's preferences were Los Angeles first, Toronto second. If he would have signed with Toronto, the Suns would have got nothing. Yes, he would have been gone across the border likely to never be heard from again, but Phoenix would have lost a valuable player without any compensation.

In the NBA you build through the draft, so acquiring picks is vital to success. I fully understand the Laker picks should be low in the first round, but nonetheless having those assets gives you options. The Suns could package their first and the Lakers' first and move up in the draft. They could package picks and make a trade or they could keep the picks and hopefully end up with a good player.

Plus, there is no guarantee the Lakers will be any good in 2015 when the Suns get their second first round pick. The second round picks are almost worthless, but they can allow you to take a flyer on an overseas player or again use as part of a trade.

Plain and simple, these picks help the rebuilding process and the Suns needed to start rebuilding and need to get younger. Suns brass did what was best for the organization here.

Signing Michael Beasley to a three-year, $18 million deal

Michael Beasley is a high-maintenance risk. I am not a fan of his at all, but the Suns believe he has matured and that he is ready to turn the corner in his career. I have my doubts.

To this point in his career Beasley has been a loser, yes a loser. He is a low-character guy and a player Minnesota has tried to trade for the last two years. So think about that -- Minnesota a young, rebuilding team has no interest in keeping a 23-year old player who was the second choice in the draft a few years ago.

There is some potential here in that Beasley is highly- skilled, something the Suns were sorely lacking. He didn't cost a lot of money or a lot of years with a three-year, $18 million contract, so his salary won't handcuff the organization. I just wouldn't let him hang out with Kendall Marshall and have any influence on the rookie first round pick.

If the Suns had Amare, Nash and Hill and they added Beasley, that's one thing. But they don't, so it's another thing altogether. I understand the Suns need to take a chance and maybe Beasley will prove me wrong, but I fear disaster here.

Goran Dragic signs a four-year contract

Goran Dragic is back and that is exciting because he really blossomed last year in Houston. He was the best free agent point guard available after Nash and Deron Williams, so this is a win-win for Phoenix.

The alternative was the fat and always out-of-shape clubhouse lawyer Raymond Felton. Dragic is much better than the 5-11 Felton, and at 6-foot-4, he can play with Marshall, which is a big plus.

Dragic comes at a respectable price of $34 million over four years. I love his work ethic and that he continues to improve year after year. I believe in Marshall and may have turned the reins over to him this year but the Suns want to gradually bring him along and Dragic allows that. Plus, if Marshall proves himself early in his career Dragic is very tradeable, Felton is not.

This was a solid move by Phoenix.

8 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    azgbayfan wrote...
    Agree kind of...
    I agree with most of what Gambo says. I don't agree with rebuilding through the draft. Jerry West says you are doing great if you are right 50% of the time. Who was in the playoffs last year. Miami, Boston, Clippers, Hawks, and Knicks. None of these teams have rebuilt through the draft. Each may have a draft pick in there but free agents put their teams over the top. OKC as lucky with Durant and Spurs even luckier with Duncan. The Lakers have 2 Bryant and Bynum. Might be an argument there but they also have Gasol, Metta and now Nash
  • Abuse
    john_az wrote...
    Disagree....
    The NBA draft is a crap shoot, at best, and that's IF you're picking in the top 10. Add that to the competency level of the current front office.....bad news. Horrible deal.
  • Abuse
    sundevil7901 wrote...
    Horrible deal?
    To lose Nash and get draft picks, which cost the Suns nothing? Look, I'm disgusted that Nash went to the enemy.But the reality is that these draft picks, either directly or indirectly (through trade) give us flexibility to improve. We aren't competing for a title in the next few years anyway. This move helps us build for the future.
  • Abuse
    esc R. wrote...
    assets
    Thats what its about boys. With the new CBA, its hard to build through FA nowadays. Draft is the best way to go because teams want young players. These are assets and we are lucky we got something as Nash was leaving us anyways. Suns have not had any assets to make any moves since the sold all their picks. Find a stud in the draft and build around him. Add trades, FA and drafts and you have a contending team if you are lucky. Suns are going to be bad, and that will be good to get better picks instead of late lottery that are scrubs.
  • Abuse
    Marc B. wrote...
    Sarver, Babby shoot Blanks
    I agree it's time to rebuild, but they should have traded Nash this past season. They would have gotten more than mid 20s draft picks. Plus we wouldn't have had to watch him go to our most hated rival. I'm not optimistic about Beasley. I've never believed people are taught to have an inner drive. Working hard enough to excel doesn't seem to be on his agenda and with Nash and Hill leaving he won't have a veteran leader to keep him on the straight and narrow. I liked the Dragic signing. I know he struggled to be consistent in Phoenix, but it looks like the time away helped him develop.
  • Abuse
    idiot4hire wrote...
    Reminder to Lakers Fans
    Just a little reminder to Lakers Fans, back in July 2003 the Lakers signed Karl Malone, and Gary Peyton, two of the leagues best in hopes of a championship. Both are still Ringless and Retired! Nash signed a 3yr deal at the very end of his career in a league of young talent like OKC and big money teams like the Heat that will still be at the top of their games in 3yrs. I guess it comes down to this. If Steve didn't think the suns could be a contender in the next 3yrs, why should I as a fan. CHEAP SEATS NEXT YEAR YAY!
  • Abuse
    azgbayfan wrote...
    Draft not the Way!
    Cowherd spent some time on his radio show this morning talking about how GMs are not treating 1st round picks like they used to. He mentioned a mock draft for next year where 3 of the top 5 were still in high school and 1 was a freshman. His point is that very few college players are ready for the NBA. They don't stay past their sophmore year. Unlike the NFL where there are only a few under classmen. In the NBA, they are all under classmen. They need molding and how they take to that molding is crucial
  • Abuse
    Screen Name wrote...
    The Draft IS a Crapshoot...
    but the picks still have some value. There have been a lot of good players taken late in the 1st round or somewhere in the 2nd round in the last decade or so. Ibaka, Batum, Rondo, & Jared Dudley were all taken somewhere in the 20's. Redd, Boozer, Arenas, & even Gortat were all 2nd round picks. Teams seem to gamble on upside more than ever, so good players can sneak through to the latter half of the draft more often than you think.
close

Share: