Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
AP: f937b4b0-c526-482f-9e05-64742a4d8288
Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kevin Kolb (4) warms up prior to a preseason NFL football game against the Oakland Raiders, Friday, Aug. 17, 2012, in Glendale, Ariz. (AP Photo/Matt York)
If there ever was a desire to buckle the ole chin strap for yet another game that doesn't count, well, ‘tis the season, right? Here in the 2012 campaign, the AZ Cardinals are currently one of two teams in the NFL with an unanswered QB question. So, how opportune that, for the first time since 1986, the schedule includes an extra game in August. Yes!!

May we present - NFL Preseason Game #5. Cardinals vs Broncos. But that's merely the undercard. The headliner: Kolb vs Skelton. Call it an exhibition, but don't call it meaningless.

Calvisi Consulting says why not defy tradition and play both quarterbacks in the final preseason game? If you're going to run the starting offensive line out there (out of necessity?), then might as well put the QB's under center.

Especially since, so far, this whole QB equation reminds me of advanced college calculus - the more I look at it, the more confounded I become. If only we could invoke our longstanding rule - "No Math" - but that's not the way it works in the NFL.

In fact, it's just the opposite. Look at Kolb's stat line from Nashville: 17-for-22 passing, with a TD. But! Kolb's pair of interceptions might as well be pimples on prom night. Forget the dress, shoes, corsage, and up-do, all anyone is looking at are the two mondo zits, err, inexplicable interceptions.

Same goes for John Skelton and his very first pass attempt, which also resulted in a confidence-rattling pick. Based on my conversation with the head coach, that pass never should've been thrown downfield. Instead, Skelton should've channeled his inner-Matt Leinart and hit the check-down.

Speaking of, after the game during our postgame radio interview on Arizona Sports 620 & AZ Cardinals radio network, Coach Whisenhunt beat me to the topic: "I know the next question is the quarterback situation and it's hard tonight because of the way the line played early, but I think that you have to go thru the tape and you have to look at the reads and see what the QB's were looking at."

As for the INTs by both QBs?

"You can't make those kind of mistakes," Whisenhunt said succintly. "One of the things that you got to learn from this is that you got to get the ball out of your hand."

Will the picks be an important part of the equation? Following my chat with Coach W, my response would be: "y'all are darn tootin', I dun reckon" (sorry, I'm still experiencing withdrawals from the Nashville scene).

"You have to factor that in when you're making the evaluations of the guys because a lot of it depends on their decision-making and you can't afford to do that," said Whisenhunt. "So that will all be part of the process in evaluating these guys."

As for why we don't have a stated timetable for a decision? That's easy. Because neither QB has made the decision with his play on the field. If anything, both QB's are creating a dust storm with zero visibility.

For example, as one of a handful of media members who has seen most of every practice, Paulie Poll has spent the past week or so conducting an unscientific study by posing the following question: "True or False - Kevin Kolb has looked better in practice, while John Skelton has fared better in games?"

From writers to broadcasters to sideline security dudes and even various players, it's been an overwhelming and unanimous "uh-huh"… Kolb has indeed been the better practice player (against more complex coverages), while Skelton has played better in the games (against a live pass rush). Confounding.

Put it this way, my final question to Coach W in the postgame locker room was based on this presumption that the QB Competition seemingly has all the clarity of an AZ haboob, while also knowing there is a final preseason game still on the schedule:

Me: "Coach, have you seen enough yet to reach a decision, whenever that is announced?"

Coach W: "I know everybody wants to, but I still have to look at this game and evaluate this. We'll see. We still have another game and another week of practice that we can look at … "

Yes x 2! Bring on preseason game #5 and be thankful for the intrigue that will carry us through an otherwise tedious preseason. In fact, at Casa Calvisi, we just might hold the first ever viewing party for a 5th Preseason game. (Bart Scott Voice) = "Can't Wait!"

13 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    whats confusing about it?
    It's pretty self explanatory! Grimm can't get the O Line playing any good. The QBs are struggling because of it. Even when they have a little bit of time, they throw INTs! It's a combination of the players not playing well enough AND the offensive coaches not coaching, teaching, and motivating them enough to get the best out of them. Obviously Whiz doesn't know anything right now. The players probably feel the same about him. And honestly, Whiz hasn't changed anything to accomadate them and play to their strengths. Unfortunately, this offense doesn't have any strenghts...
  • Abuse
    thorjeremy501 wrote...
    practice vs game
    To me this team would be a solid top ten team and could take the NFC west if it only had an OL. I love what the front office is doing (building a Steeler like team). We are going to go through more than 2 QB's and RB's but not because of their talent but lack of OL talent. John/Kevin are going to get murdered out there, look bad and take the blame for the losses. May as well start John, fans love to see QB's start and end careers with one team. Draft OL and give Grim a pink slip and perhaps a new OC for Skelton.
  • Abuse
    Think4URself wrote...
    I see the problem.
    1) Coaches want QBs to make check downs, and 2) Coaches want QBs to get rid of the ball before they get sacked. All, while competing for a position based heavily on stats. So, WITHOUT ANY PASS PROTECTION, Coaches expect a QB to A) stand in the pocket and get rocked doing his checkdowns and possibly fumble the ball or B) move around the pocket (in less than 3 secs) and possibly quickly force it, or throw it away. I see two inevitable outcomes, turnovers and incompletions. And, looking at stats that is EXACTLY the outcome we are seeing.
  • Abuse
    Think4URself wrote...
    So, someone gonna get hurt, badly.
    The Cards theory on player evaluation has an obvious logical fallocy. You cant evaluate a QB without taking everything into account and it must balanced to win. Mgmts failure to understand the football equation and lean toward the FINANCIAL equation is going to get both QBs hurt seriously.
  • Abuse
    Think4URself wrote...
    The equation is pretty simple
    Generally speaking this is how it works, if you want a winning organization: If you have a below average QB, you need a very good Oline, running game and a great D. (SB winning Ravens) If you have an average QB, you need a darn good Oline, good running game and solid D. (2011 49ers) If you have a above average QB, you need decent Oline and running game, and a solid D. (SB Winning Giants) If you have a great QB, you need a decent Oline and running game, ...the better the defense - the better the chance of winning SBs. (Pats, Saints, Packers, Colts (old)).
  • Abuse
    Think4URself wrote...
    The one time the Cards were balanced...
    They went to the super bowl. They had a great QB, an average (at best) line, a decent running game, and a solid , but not exception D. So, if they has a little better protection or a slightly better D, that game would have likely ended with a different winner. I hope you also noticed I said nothing about WRs. There is very good reason for this...they dont equate to wins. The Pats, Steelers, Giants, Saints, and Packers dont have Tier 1 WRs-they have a bunch of tier 2s.
  • Abuse
    Think4URself wrote...
    That said...
    The Cards have have two early 1st round WRs. A backup QB competing with a legitimate 5th rnd QB. A lousy Oline and a solid D, which is 2 players short of being great (Strong side ILB and a legimate passrushing OLB). So, as they stand as of now (and last 2 years), they have a below avg QB, a decent running game, a lousy Oline, and a solid D. If the team wanted to be a winner, they need to significantly improve at QB and improve LT. Or, slightly improve QB, and greatly improve Oline. They did neither of this in the draft or in free agency in 2012. They wont win, people.
  • Abuse
    Bigtymefan wrote...
    Think back to last year....
    If memory is correct, this is pretty much the same team that finished the 2011 season winning 7 of 9 games. My focus is going to be on the Defense, Running game, and Peterson returning punts. Those 3 things will give us a chance in most games. I'm not counting on our QB to run our offense like Drew Brees or somthing like that. Thats not going to happen.
  • Abuse
    hugUhbear wrote...
    I saw Whiz play to Kolb's strength by using the
    two minute drill. Kolb is a shotgun QB and that is his stance in the two minute drill as well as it creates rythm and does not allow the defense to get subs in and out therfore they do become more tired. That was Whiz giving Kolb a better chance at success and it showed up. kolb flashed that he can run the offense and make the throws if the Offense is tailored to his skillset and the O line gives him just a few precious seconds of protection.
  • Abuse
    hugUhbear wrote...
    Just watched Carolina vs NYJ
    4th Qtr action: Derek Andersan led a really nice drive and made some really good throws. He actually looked better than any of our QB's. I think I need a beer, I am so discouraged about the last 3 years of QB play and more importantly O-line play for the last three years. Grimm will con't to be our O-line coach until he gets Whiz fired. And he will, he is the albatross that brings down our coach.
close

Share: