Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
AP: 761530cd-d505-4c9b-949a-189e2e4f1673
Arizona Cardinals' John Skelton, left, passes in the first half of an NFL football game against the Philadelphia Eagles, Sunday, Nov. 13, 2011, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum)
Much of the talk after the Cardinals' improbable 21-17 win over the Philadelphia Eagles Sunday has been about the quarterback position and what is now a bona-fide QB controversy.

Or is it?

Quarterback A has completed 56.8 percent of his passes for an average of 7.5 yards per attempt, has a 1:1 touchdown to interception ratio and has been sacked an average of 3.4 times per game. His QB rating stands at a solid 77.8.

Quarterback B has completed 54.7 percent of his passes for an average of 7.2 yards per attempt, has a 2:1 touchdown to interception ratio and has been sacked an average of 3.5 times per game. His QB rating is 84.1.

Quarterback A is Kevin Kolb, and it's worth noting that the only thing he did to earn the starting QB job is get traded for and sign a contract extension. Nothing he's done on the field makes him seem like a better option than Quarterback B, John Skelton, which is why the second-year pro should be the starter going forward.

It's not that Skelton is Tom Brady circa 2001. He's done a solid job the last two games - both wins - but is hardly the reason for the victories. Skelton has played a significant role, and that is something no one can ignore. At least, they shouldn't. The Cardinals shouldn't.

Most pointed to the defense and special teams as why the Cardinals beat the Rams a week ago, and they were right. The QB didn't mess things up, but he was hardly brilliant. He wasn't brilliant in Philadelphia on Sunday throwing a pair of really bad interceptions, but he was resilient in leading touchdown drives after each turnover. He was clutch, leading scoring drives of 84, 89 and 87 yards, including some ridiculous throws on the game-winner. He was the first Cardinals QB to win away from Glendale since September of 2010, and is now responsible for four of the team's eight wins in the post-Kurt Warner era.

Why ignore that?

The common theme for most seems to be the Cardinals made a hefty investment in Kolb and would be foolish to bail on him now. Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, a second round pick and a big contract extension was the price to bring the QB to Arizona, and the Cardinals owe it to themselves to try and make it work.

Well, the trade happened and it's not getting reversed. Why let one mistake lead to more? I believe the term is "sunk cost," and the team should not worry about the past, rather it should focus on the future.

Who should start at QB for the Cardinals?
John Skelton
Kevin Kolb
If the Cardinals made a mistake with the Kolb trade they would do themselves a favor to try to move on as soon as possible. Of course, it is too early to say the trade was a failure, and it's premature to say Kolb will never become the QB the Cards thought he would. The move to go with Skelton isn't as much about Kolb as it is the Fordham product's future.

Skelton is 6-foot-6, 244 pounds, has a canon for an arm and has shown great improvement from his rookie year. He has great poise and, dare I say, moxie, as he's led a pair of fourth-quarter comebacks in his career (Kolb has zero). Skelton has looked every bit as promising as any young QB the Cards have had, and at 23 with just six starts to his name one can assume there is plenty of room for him to learn and improve. That learning can happen this season, and he deserves the opportunity.

Think about it: The Cardinals are not making the playoffs, so this is the perfect time to get a young QB some much- needed reps. While the argument can be made that Kolb needs them - and he could use the experience - one can't really say he deserves them. Skelton does, and would benefit just as much as the 27-year-old rookie will.

The Arizona Cardinals are no longer in the "Suck For Luck" sweepstakes, and they may have swung and missed on the Kevin Kolb trade. Fortunately for them, the team's next QB may already be on the roster, already winning games. Is John Skelton a finished product? Hardly. But the tools are there with which to work with, and in time the Cards may have something special on their hands.

They could start that process by putting the team in Skelton's.

24 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    omicron26 wrote...
    Skelton to Fitzgerald
    i like the sound of that.
  • Abuse
    Mgoblu62 wrote...
    your a idiot
    skelton is terible most of fitzs catches were off target he throws better to the other team kolb may not be the answer but skelton sucks worse the defense bails them out
  • Abuse
    Chuck H. wrote...
    Mgoblu62... your the idiot...
    stick to college football!! The article isnt a glowing endorsement for Skelton. In fact, it properly critcizes Skeltons deficiencies. What it DOES say is that Skelton looks poised (moxie)... which he does! Its says the team has won more than they've lost (2-0, '11; 4-2 overall) with Skelton at the helm. He IS moving the offense and IS doing so with confidence. He IS making plays both with his arm and his legs. The defense IS finally playing better and the ST's are doing their part. Skelton should get the next start as his play and the teams response has EARNED him that much!!
  • Abuse
    Chuck H. wrote...
    what says it all.....
    from another KTAR article: "...when there was a chance to win a game by making a play, Skelton got it done--an area where Kolb has failed four times this season."
  • Abuse
    ArizonaSportsFan66 wrote...
    No controversy
    No brainer, Skelton should be the starter over Kolb. The guy is young, talented, tall so he can see the field better then Kolb. Skelton is 4 years younger and people he's 4-2 as a starter. It just sucks how this pay structure works in pro sports because Kolb just like Leinert can collect his paycheck and still sit on the bench. With Kolb he's played the same type of west coast offense in Philly so there can't be any excuses anymore about learning the system.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    I agree, Skelton should start!
    Whiz picked him because of his size advantage. Hes big like Ben. He made some clutch throws yesterday on 3rd downs. He got alot of help from his recievers because he spread the love. Skelton is doing the things Kolb was asked to do but can't... I think Whiz's offense is in dire need of a QB who can make those clutch throws like Skelton. Go with your heart Whiz!!! Dont let Kolb fans or Kolb fans in the media make your decision for you. Your offense needs this man (John Skelton) and you know it!
  • Abuse
    theAdamGreen wrote...
    Paul H.
    It's not my money, I think the team should do what's best for them. And rarely is that NOT playing the younger player when the season is lost and he's more effective anyway.
  • Abuse
    Chuck H. wrote...
    Trust in Wiz?
    How many times last year did we hear from coach, "....(insert qb name) gives us the best chance to win..."? Or in his first 2 seasons, we will create competition at every position and those that compete and are making plays, regardless of their "names" will play. Skelton has earned the right to start next week based on those two principles that Wiz has preached in the past. Kolb has not.
  • Abuse
    theuglytruth wrote...
    It's difficult to ignore the
    ...21 first downs in this game, or the game winning 11 play 87 yard drive when Skelton had the ball in his hands every play. He was a positive factor in the 2 drives that put AZ into FG range as Beanie only had 10 yards rushing combined in those series. Add to that the 84, 89 yd scoring drives. He's not perfect, but he's done nicely when given the opportunity. It's unfortunate Kolb hasn't done the same with his opportunity.
close

Share: