Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Would you rather be shot or stabbed? Run over by a truck or choke on a breadstick? Drown or be eaten by a Tyrannasaurus Rex? OK, maybe the last one is pretty obvious (T-Rex, duh), but the gist is this:

Bad options are bad options, and what the city of Glendale is facing right now, with regards to the Phoenix Coyotes, are bad options.

Keep them by spending money they don't have or let them leave and forego a chance to make money down the road.

Awesome.

Truth is, one of the choices is better than the other, and it's the former. Keep the Coyotes in town and hope for the best down the road.

The damage from the team leaving would be significant.

Westgate, for all intents and purposes, could shut down. Civic pride would undoubtedly take a hit, as no one should feel good about watching a team bolt town. And to top it all off we'd be losing a hockey team -- a very good hockey team, mind you -- right as they're looking like a franchise worth following.

Want to know how painful it is to watch a team turn into one of the league's best shortly after leaving town? Just look at Seattle, who are watching the Thunder head to the NBA Finals.

In short, it stinks.

Of course, none of this has anything to do with the budget issues that have befallen Glendale. The city has very little money to spend, and any reasonable person would say what is there should be used for first responders, civic services and the like long before professional sports. But letting the Coyotes leave will not fix their budget; they'd have the same problems, just with one fewer hockey team.

The Goldwater Institute, which is best known for stopping the NHL's deal with Matthew Hulsizer last summer, is threatening to do all it can to stop this sale, too. Whether it's a failed attempt to block last Friday's vote or the idea that they'll sue over its result, the organization who says its mission is to "advance freedom and protect the Constitution" is really just trying to prove a point, regardless of whether or not it actually benefits Glendale's residents.

Are their motives pure? No. Do they have a point? Yes. Should we want them to prevail once again? Nope.

Anyone who says the deal the city is trying to make with Greg Jamison and his group is a good one is lying, and the fact that the vote was pushed through in a backdoor-deal- kind-of-way only adds to the perception that something is amiss here.

There probably is.

But how they get to the right decision does not matter so much as they do, indeed, get there. While it is difficult to justify giving money to a rich man so he can, umm, make more money in these economic times, that's exactly what needs to happen here.

Paper or plastic? Crunchy or creamy? With bacon or without? OK, once again there's an obvious answer to the third option (and, in case you were wondering, it's with bacon), while none of the six choices would lead down a disastrous road (except for not choosing bacon, of course).

The city of Glendale is not so lucky, as they are forced to decide between bad and awful.

And, as it pertains to the Phoenix Coyotes, the only option that has a chance of working out for Glendale is keeping them in town.

10 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    mesa mad man wrote...
    Like it or not
    Glendale put themselves in this position. They went out on a limb and brought a football team and an nhl team to a city on the far side of town. Then the economy crumbled. Just like half of america, it put them in between a rock and a hard spot.
  • Abuse
    Rassam wrote...
    "Coyotes are forcing Glendale to choose..."???
    The Yotes are not forcing anything. They're just giving Glendale an another option. You may not like that option, but it is better than no option at all. Besides, does anybody think that Glendale's current financial problems will last for 20 years, the length of the contract?
  • Abuse
    aznative1967 wrote...
    Coyotes
    I agree keeping the Coyotes in Glendale is a better option than letting them go. If Glendale lets them go Glendale spends money maintaining an empty arena. If they stay, Glendale still spends money but they are at least getting something in return. I wonder how much sales tax revenue Glendale receives during the hockey season from people spending money on dinner, souveniers, etc. Probably not enough to make up the difference but its better than it would be if the Coyotes were gone.
  • Abuse
    USCitizen wrote...
    mesa mad man...
    Glendale is NOT on the far side of town, just not on your side. Those of us on the west side are just as proud of our location as you are of yours and you know what? they are both great places to live. Where the yotes are located at would not matter much in this story, east or west cannot afford the team nor can they aford to lose the team. But I know I am a season ticket holder for the Cardnals now and I never went to a game when they were in Tempe. Fans wil go where ever the team plays regardless of east or west side.
  • Abuse
    Stadium_guy wrote...
    Enough is enough!!!
    Yotes have proven that they are a contending team w/ their hands tied behind their backs. New owners that bring new money and a proven track record of a hockey man makes an opportunity to continue to improve & put an exciting product on the ice that will draw more regular attendance and reduce losses for the team. GWI needs to quit wasting time & $ to scare off the investors. The valley needs to get behind the Yotes & let them know that they are a valued product & move on with more important things in council mtgs like what to do to build Glendale into a place people want to live & visit.
  • Abuse
    moreno900 wrote...
    coyotes
    Without them Glendale would fall hard to its knees, sure the cards Are there but that's only 8 weeks out of the year. I live in Glendale and I understand It getting expensive to live here but I would much rather know the coyotes are there and enjoy them when I can rather than go to westgate and only see a movie. After the coyotes win the cup next year it will be worth having them here win or lose. Hoooooooooooooooowl.
  • Abuse
    mesa mad man wrote...
    despite my fantastic name
    i live in phoenix - about 15 minutes from the happening city of glendale. i agree with you that FANS will go regardless of where the team is located. the problem is phoenix has a large number of horrible fans that only go when the team is winning or to see their "real" team. the odds of them traveling cross city becomes substantially less - especially in this economy. This is the reason a centrally located team stands a better chance to succeed then a team on the outskirts (be it west of east)
  • Abuse
    mesa mad man wrote...
    dont get me wrong though
    i dont think glendale did a bad thing in getting the teams. had this been ten years earlier i think they would have succeeded with flying colors. the issue lies simply in investing so much money, and hope, in a nonemerged market when the economy is crumbling. they really went all in and banked on it leading them to the promise land, and when it hasnt they dont have a backup plan.
  • Abuse
    motorcitymadmanofmesa wrote...
    For the love of the Coyotes
    Hey Glendale, let me start by saying I don't live there, I live 50 miles east of Jobing.com Arena and just moved here 1 year ago. I have lost 2 Minor league Hockey teams in my past, Orlando and Austin. It hurts if you are a hockey fan, losing a NHL team would really hurt. I really hope The Coyotes stay. I can't help you Glendale with taxes you collect there as I am a resident of Mesa. But I can and do promise my support as a season ticket holder for as long as they drop the puck there. Let's Go Coyotes!
  • Abuse
    Jarrod P. wrote...
    STOP IT
    Stop with the location argument- THE LOCATION SUCKS.. Bottom line. A conference champion, three years in a row playoff team cannot sell tickets-- what else has to happen. There is no fan base, poor location, etc etc etc
close

Share: