Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Marshall_.jpg
Kendall Marshall is a solid player, but needs talent around him to succeed. (AP Photo)
Phoenix Suns GM Lance Blanks said one of the things the team liked about Kendall Marshall was that "if you look in his background, in his history, he's a winner."

Well, with the Suns likely to struggle for the next few seasons, the theory is really going to be put to the test.

The Suns made the Tar Heel their first round pick, 13th overall, Thursday, and the selection was not met without some question marks. Sure, you're not likely to get a consensus cheer for anyone you take that late in the lottery, but going with a guy who is not much of an athlete, defender or scorer is a little puzzling.

Sure, Marshall is an excellent passer -- he averaged 9.8 assists per game as a sophomore -- and there is little doubt he'll be a good locker room presence and leader, which is certainly a positive. He may be asked to backup two-time MVP Steve Nash or, perhaps, replace him, and his ability to dish the ball could rival that of the Suns legend.

Unfortunately for the Suns, though, they also need scoring, defense, rebounding and athleticism -- traits Marshall, for all the good he brings, does not possess.

Think about it: what good is a great passer if his teammates cannot put the ball in the basket, and how effective can a point guard be if he is not a threat to score the ball himself? Steve Nash forces defenses to respect his shot, and thus they leave teammates open.

Marshall, who made 47 percent of his shots as a sophomore, is not a scorer. He knows that, and he knows he has to improve. He thinks he will.

"Obviously now, there's no school to get in the way," Marshall said. "This is my profession, this is my job. I have no choice but to get better, so I'm not too worried about it."

He might very well do just that, but it will all be moot if the talent around him doesn't get better, and while Marshall may ultimately be a solid player in the NBA, this pick will only be a success if the Suns surround him with enough talent to take advantage of his skills and mask his deficiencies.

You know, just as they did with Nash all those years.

And while Blanks maintains this pick has nothing to do with Nash's impending free agency -- that whether he stays or goes, Marshall was the guy -- this pick, and the team's future, are certainly tied to what the Suns accomplish over the rest of the summer.

The Suns have admitted they lack a "go-to" scorer, someone who they can pencil into the lineup and expect to get 20 points out of every night. While there is no guarantee they would have found that guy at 13 -- in fact, chances are they wouldn't -- they certainly don't have him in Marshall.

The Suns' newest player is a pass-first point guard, part of a dying breed of floor generals who would rather dish the rock than put in in the bucket. The game has been taken over by scorers, as they've become far more valuable than players who can set them up.

Blanks said the Suns took Marshall because of his brains and ability to make those around him better.

"He is in perfect alignment with what we want to be about as people and as an organization," he said.

That sounds nice, but it will all be for naught if the people and organization around him don't improve.

12 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    mesa mad man wrote...
    Pick
    Regardless of what happens next season, this is not a one year fix. everyone knows that despite how much they will complain. the thing that is angering me is why there are still great prospects available with some upside and little commitment and the suns arent jumping in. the pacers BOUGHT a draft pick for cash. The suns have sold picks in the past when we were trying to win - if they are committed to building with young talent, at least bring in some young talent!!! there wont be a better chance to pick up talent this late in the near future.
  • Abuse
    azgbayfan wrote...
    Who?
    You seem unimpressed. Who would you have picked Adam?
  • Abuse
    theAdamGreen wrote...
    @azgbayfan
    At that spot it's really tough to find the difference maker, so I don't know. My point isn't that Marshall was a bad pick, just that it will only look good if the team around him improves. He's the type that needs talent around him to be effective.
  • Abuse
    Tennisgrandpa wrote...
    deeper and deeper
    Have the Suns improved with this pick? no. This guy gunna be the difference in the Suns making the playoffs? no. Mesa I agree this isn't a one year fix, with the guys we are locked into contracts with, we're looking at a 5 year fix. It's only a one year fix if Sarver sells the team to someone that knows basketball. We are so far from being a competitive team like we used to be, we're dropping more and more. We're the new, old Clippers. Maybe we can get Michael Olowokandie.
    Dale
  • Abuse
    azgbayfan wrote...
    No 1 year fix
    Sarver is not a good owner and in his short stint a terrible GM. There isn't an owner and GM in this league who could fix this team in a year. Sarver dictated that with the long term deals he gave Frye, Warrick, and Childress. The only way to improve is to add Stars around your role players, which is reverse of what good teams do. No free agents out there worthy of long term deals yet that is what they are going to want. I would amnesty Childress but I don't think the Suns will.
  • Abuse
    kdaddy wrote...
    Marshall a solid pick
    I was very happy they picked Marshall and he will be a difference maker if they can add the right pieces around him and Gorat over the next couple of years. As every Suns fan knows a great set up guard will make even mediocre players look better than they really are as we all witnessed the past 2 years with Nash. It would have been more ideal if Phoenix was able to buy or barter for another first round draft pick but at least they didn't waste the selection they had.
  • Abuse
    mesa mad man wrote...
    Gortat
    It maybe an unpopular opinion, but i think we need to trade gortat. A team like maybe Atlanta or Boston that could use a veteran upgrade at the center position to put them over the top might be willing to part with a future draft pick or a draft pick from this years draft that we could use to build around. Again, the more talent we get early on in the rebuilding process should allow it to get a little quicker. No reason keeping Gortat who could be well into his 30s before we seriously contend.
  • Abuse
    Jdanielson wrote...
    The new Kings
    I normally always praise a pick that went for the best available talent, not need, but this pick is absolutely horrible. An unathletic player who can't shoot or play defense on an unathletic team that can't shoot or play defense. I'm fully unathletic isn't even a word, but you get my drift. Horrible pick. Management has no idea what they are doing, and are slowly but surely turning this team into the second coming of the Sacramento Kings. The Kings, though, at least have some young up-and-coming talent, so even they have a step up on us. Total garbage.
close

Share: