Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
AP: ac15ac11-f277-4929-92ba-5f26182c74e9
Will Ken Whisenthunt really choose John Skelton? If so, he's likely saying goodbye to Kevin Kolb in the process. (AP Photo)
The news came as a shock.

Sort of.

ESPN's Adam Schefter reported Tuesday that John Skelton is the favorite to win the Cardinals QB job.

This is the same Adam Schefter who first brought up the idea that the Cardinals may part with Matt Leinart in September 2010, so it's safe to say he may have a pretty good idea of what's going on in Arizona.

Skelton, of course, has outplayed Kolb in the preseason, if only by a small margin. He's shown improved accuracy, a good feel for the pocket and an ability to take a hit, get up and go again.

Kevin Kolb has done none of these things.

However, if Cardinals coach Ken Whisenhunt does indeed decide to go with Skelton September 9 when the season opens against the Seahawks, he will essentially be ending Kevin Kolb's career as an Arizona Cardinal.

At least, he should be.

Two years ago the Cardinals were in a similar situation, as Coach Whiz decided Matt Leinart was not the guy to lead the team into the future. The decision to go with Derek Anderson was bad, but the fact was once it was made there was no going back to Leinart.

The job was supposed to be his, and the second he lost grasp of it there was no way to even fake confidence in him going forward. Should Anderson struggle or get hurt the coach and team would have to profess faith that the former Heisman Trophy winner could do the very job no one thought he could do just months before.

It wouldn't work, which is why the coach decided it would be best to just sever ties with the QB rather than keep him on the roster as the backup.

The same would have to be done for Kolb, right?

As I wrote in my column Monday, going with Kolb first leaves the option of turning the keys over to Skelton should the need arise.

It would be easy to justify the move should Kolb struggle or get injured, and there would be no harm, no foul. However, go with Skelton and there is no backup plan that can involve Kolb.

It was his job to lose, and he would have lost it.

And if history is any indication, the starting QB role isn't the only job he's about to lose.

4 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Kreedos wrote...
    Well put...
    This is a tough one here. I like Skelton over Kolb all day. My fear is, as a fan of WHiz, that the Cards dont do well this season and the front office gets revamped. They've missed on the most important position in the game for several years in a row now. I hope Skelton starts and leads them to a wild card playoff berth. But at the same time, we need a top 3-5 QB. Bottom line.
  • Abuse
    theuglytruth wrote...
    Still early...
    ...so you never know. I like Skelton, he's progressed nicely from a small college, shot gun spread offense to a pocket passer taking snaps under center...he deserves credit for this progress. I still think he needs more time to grow. As for Kolb...I would like to see Kolb start just so that Whiz can say he did everything he could to make it work. Skelton finishes the season mostly likely in any case. Lindley has spot work at the back end of the season. We draft a LT next year in the 1st round.
  • Abuse
    sundevil7901 wrote...
    Green, it depends
    on how you feel about Ryan Lindley. If you think Lindley is ready to be the back-up, you go ahead and ship Kolb out of town. If not, you hold onto Kolb. The Leinart scenario you speak of blew up in Whiz's face because he thought he'd be fine with Max Hall as backup. Hall, a rookie who looked good against 3rd and 4th stringers. Sound familiar to what we are seeing now?
  • Abuse
    hugUhbear wrote...
    People are talking like this organization
    knows how to evaluate QB talent. That has not been shown. Take Warner out because he was already a known commodity and you have a staff that has chosen DAnderson, MLeinert, Max Hall, Kolb, Bartel, Skelton and Lindley. Add to that the crazy moves like Leinert being shuffled out of town the same preseason he started training camp as the starter. Or the missed assesment on Max Hall as a starting QB. Or the ridiculous belief that DA was a starter. Now add that the O-line seamingly can not be developed under Grimm
close

Share: