Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
AP: 9b26e13e-d5d2-4d5c-bfe8-ec4681e26f78
Arizona Cardinals safety Kerry Rhodes (25) tackles New England Patriots running back Stevan Ridley (22) in the second half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Sept. 16, 2012, in Foxborough, Mass. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
According to the team's 2012 media guide, Ray Horton "enters his second season with the Cardinals as defensive coordinator after being hired on 2/9/11. Beginning his 19th year as an NFL assistant, Horton came to Arizona after spending seven seasons with the Pittsburgh Steelers, including the last four years as the team's defensive backs coach."

On the off chance Horton is still around for the 2013 version and not beginning his first season as a head coach somewhere, the Cards should add "sorcerer" to his title.

Most of us felt the Cardinals' defense would be good this season, especially with the way the group finished 2011. But few of us could have predicted they'd be this good.

Horton's defense is the reason the Cardinals are 2-0 for the first time since 2008, it's the reason the Cardinals are coming off a monster win in New England against the Patriots, and it's the reason the team has a shot at getting to the postseason this year even though the offense has done little to help the cause thus far.

Let's be clear: even before Ryan Williams' untimely fumble the offense was doing everything it could to give this game away. The Cardinals picked up just 16 first downs, collected a mere 245 yards of total offense, and put together just three drives that lasted more than five plays.

Arizona averaged just four yards per play, and while Kevin Kolb was not horrible, his performance was not exactly what one would classify as a good one. He missed some throws but made some plays, doing nothing to cost the Cardinals a chance at a victory.

And that in itself was enough for the Cards to earn their biggest regular season win since 2009 because Horton's group made Tom Brady as uncomfortable in the pocket as most of us would be around the QB's wife and found a way to avoid giving up the big play.

The defense made one of the NFL's premier passers and top offenses look incredibly pedestrian in their own building Sunday, and in the process sent a message to the rest of the league that states:

If you want to beat the Cardinals you'll have to go through one of the league's best defenses first.

Kind of makes you wonder, if only the team had this defense with Kurt Warner's offense.

But that doesn't matter, at least not right now. All the Cardinals need out of the offensive side of the football is exactly what they got Sunday in Foxborough: make few mistakes and just enough plays.

Seems easy enough, right?

The Cardinals don't need a great offense to win games -- that much is obvious. As long as they can play 60 minutes of football without messing up, the team will have a good shot at winning the game.

The Baltimore Ravens carried that philosophy all the way to a win in Super Bowl XXXV. Sure, Arizona's run game isn't as good and the defense is not quite as dominant (yet), but it has been proven that a team can win big even if it lacks an explosive offense.

It may not be pretty, but it is effective. And it's exactly how the Cardinals are going to win games in 2012.

13 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    KDub&ADub1324 wrote...
    Love it...
    ...when people want to count the Cards out. It makes their wins that much sweeter
  • Abuse
    AZSPORTFAN wrote...
    Offense
    Did anyone notice that the offense didn't allow Kolb to be sacked? Also, it seemed like we hardly had any penalities ..... All around a pretty darn good game on both sides of the ball.
  • Abuse
    Imiss13 wrote...
    Good job Cards....
    Kolb did a great job, Williams was terrible, and Stephens Howling is our best running back. I cringe to think about them putting Skelton back in there when he recovers. Ugghh.
  • Abuse
    Kreedos wrote...
    nice to read
    I think Skelton may have thrown and INT somewhere in that game, but thats neither here nor there. Great team win. And Williams has been a super let down thus far, but I think he will come back around and grow as the season progresses.
  • Abuse
    johnnyb588 wrote...
    Let's not get ahead of ourselves
    This defense is NOT great by any standard. This is a solid defense, respectably in the top-half of the NFL, but in no way should this defense be mentioned with the likes of the 2000 Ravens. That D was good enough to get Trent Dilfer (quite possibly worse than Kolb/Skelton) a ring. Trent. Dilfer. This D? 13th in yds/gm, 10th in pass yds/gm, 13th in rush yds/gm. That is not dominant. It is good. Good enough to keep a bad offense in some games. But not dominant.
  • Abuse
    theuglytruth wrote...
    Really?
    Great win!! Nice job DEFENSE! But, to be completely honest the Cards need to tighten up their game. Kolb is off the mark when he throws to his right, he can't hit a seam pass to the TE to save his life and forget about a screen pass. The cards D & special teams gave the O a short field...can't keep walking away with field goals.
  • Abuse
    Ross T. wrote...
    Good job Cards...
    Good job Cards...I agree with your comments for sure. Although I don't agree so much with the "when they put Skelton back in there" comment. It's a no win situation for the coaching staff. Put Skelton in & lose, bad decision right? Put Kolb in and lose, bad decision? Let's face it, we don't have a HOF QB like many other teams, and until we get one, it's not going to change.
  • Abuse
    Biffleford16 wrote...
    They got Lucky at the end...
    They Played a great game for the most part but that Fumble at the end should have been costly, they got lucky this time next time they won't be so lucky
  • Abuse
    mesa mad man wrote...
    luck
    Luck has nothing to do with it - or everything to do with it, depending on how you look at it. Just because that was the last play of the game doesnt mean we didnt deserve to win. Gostkowski made two field goals over 50 - that seems pretty lucky to me. Had he missed one of those, different game.
  • Abuse
    johnnyb588 wrote...
    Regarding "luck"
    NFL kickers will make a 42 yarder nearly 80% of the time (read Barnwell's analysis on grantland, if you don't believe me). Four out of five times, the Cardinals lose that game. What Gostkowski had done previously in the game, in the realm of statistics, has no bearing on how he will perform for any individual kick in the present or future. Just because you think someone is "due" for a make or a miss doesn't mean they will hit or miss. Each kick has the same probability. The Cardinals got lucky from the standpoint that four out of five times, that field goal will go in.
close

Share: