Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
AP: 56d224fb-ee94-4611-acfc-3d1b8c7f1f34
Arizona Cardinals quarterback Ryan Lindley (14) is sacked by New York Jets defensive end Muhammad Wilkerson, back, as safety Yeremiah Bell (37) and linebacker Bart Scott (57) help defend during the second half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Dec. 2, 2012, in East Rutherford, N.J. The Jets won 7-6. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun)
Rarely does a sporting event live up to its pre-game billing, but the Cardinals' visit to New York did exactly that.

This game, which the Jets "won" by a score of 7-6, was every bit as poorly played as we thought it would be. In fact, it may have even been more pathetic than anticipated.

The Jets' Mark Sanchez threw three interceptions. The Cardinals' longest play from scrimmage was a fake punt. And Ryan Lindley, the Cardinals' latest in a long list of disasters at quarterback, completed 10-of-31 passes for 72 yards and one interception.

Sanchez was benched in the third quarter; Lindley played the entire game. Sanchez's replacement threw the game-winning touchdown pass. As for Lindley?

"You look at it and you say he's got to play better, and he does," Whisenhunt told the Arizona Cardinals Radio Network after the game. "If he wants to be the quarterback of this team he's got to play better than that, and I think he understands that."

There's little doubt Lindley would like to be the team's quarterback, and who knows, maybe in time he will be. But right now it's obvious he's not anywhere close to being ready for the job. The coaching staff recognized that, too, and considered making a change Sunday afternoon.

"But at the time where we were, the way he talked on the sideline and was handling what he needed to handle as the quarterback and then he made the good throw to Michael (Floyd) on the sideline after we got the turnover there late," the coach said, adding he thought the Cardinals were going to score a touchdown on the fourth quarter drive instead of having to settle for a Jay Feely field. "You consider all those things and you ultimately go with what you think gives you the best chance to win."

Lindley completed less than 1/3 of his passes and averaged fewer than three yards per attempt. The Cardinals went 0-for-15 on third down and moved the chains just five times. And yet, he gave the team the best chance to win?

If Lindley gives the team its best chance to win, one must wonder what the prize is. After all, it's too late to suck for Luck.

Anyway, it's the same baseless claim the coach had when he replaced John Skelton in Atlanta with a lead, after Lindley's pair of pick-sixes cost Arizona a chance to beat the Rams, and now after the rookie put forth a miserable effort in the Big Apple.

Either Whisenhunt is lying to us, and he really has given up on the season and is rolling with the rookie with an eye towards the future, or he's just clueless when it comes to the quarterback position.

Both options are currently still on the table.

The Cardinals coach is backed into a corner with this one. Kevin Kolb may be ready to come back, but what good comes from giving him the starting job with the playoffs out of reach and the QB not likely to return next season? It would be tough to turn back to Skelton, a third-year player who likely has little confidence left after the coach turned his back on him with a 10-point lead just a few short weeks ago. Like Kolb, Skelton is not likely to return in 2013.

And Lindley, a sixth-round pick who has no business playing right now but will be back next year, has shown nothing that would make someone think the team will win any of the final four games with him under center.

What's a coach to do?

Deal with the mess he made and suffer the ramifications.

It's been said that Whisenhunt is one of the game's best and smartest coaches, and it's easy to see why.

After all, he guided the Cardinals to the Super Bowl, and was well-respected enough that Peyton Manning paid the franchise a visit last March when he was looking for a new team.

However, with Whisenhunt's smarts have come a certain level of confidence that, unfortunately, has led to some questionable decisions over the last few seasons.

Is it a case of "I'm smarter than you, and I'm going to prove it?"

Kind of looks that way.

What else would you call Whisenhunt's decision to turn to Derek Anderson and Max Hall in 2010? Why else would the Cardinals trade for Kolb and ask him to fit the offense instead of adapting the offense to fit the QB?

And how else could someone interpret the reactionary decision to bench a struggling-but-winning Skelton in favor of a rookie who, through no fault of his own, has no business being on the field right now?

Quarterback controversies are fun; quarterback ineptitude is painful to watch.

And when the issues are created by a head coach who seems unable to fix things?

There's really only one thing to do.

The last time the Arizona Cardinals lost eight-straight games was 2006, when the team was breaking in a first-round draft pick named Matt Leinart. The slide was embarrassing, and it helped usher Dennis Green out of town.

Ken Whisenhunt is a better coach than Green, but at this point it's tough not to expect him to suffer a similar fate.

29 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    At a loss
    I feel like I've defended whiz as much as any body, largely on the grounds that I don't feel theres any one else out there who could do better with what Whiz has to work with. That said... saying he kept lindley in cause he gave them the best chance to win!? WHAT. THE. HECK!???? Unless Skelton has a secret injury we don't know about or told the coach he would throw the game on purpose if put into the game, the only way to look at that comment is that Whiz has lost his mind.
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    I mean really now
    If he really was "throwing the season", that would actually be fine by me, even if we'd won out we likely weren't making the playoffs, I'm willing to swallow that he kept Lindley in their cause he's playing for next season, wants to get him experience, see if he could make adjustments or improve or what have you, and get a better pick for next year in the process. But that's not what whiz said, he said he went with the guy he felt gave us the best chance to win. That just flat out shattered any credibility Whiz had with me...
  • Abuse
    Hummer71 wrote...
    You wonder
    If I didn't know better, you'd think Whiz wants out. His roster decisions sure look that way. M. Bidwill just may have to gibe him what he wants. It's sad because Whiz gave us a lot of smiles for 2-3 years. Something pretty rare around here. Someone major has to go. Not just some assistant. Promote Ray before he goes to Carolina or Diego.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    The offense needs a change at coaches
    Obviously theres a disconnection between the Offensive players and the Offensive coaches. Theres a change needed at whoever has the final say in Offensive scheming/play-calling and whoever has the final say at making offensive adjustments. Whether its Mike Miller, Whiz, or both. The playcalling was horrible. The D did a great job as usual. The Offense punted the ball over and over and over and over again. Drives were opened in shotgun formations where they passed 3x's and punted or they started with a run and passed the next 3x's. They're pass happy and the playcalling is 2 predictable.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    The pass is not going to work
    And hes too stubborn to let it go. Its pathetic and very predictable and easy to defend. Like I said, we're in need of change.
  • Abuse
    CroDawg wrote...
    Serioulsy
    Can anybody name a worse offense in the entire league? I'm at a loss for words after channel flipping this game.
  • Abuse
    MikeWins wrote...
    the mess he created?
    This is silly... The guy has already proven he can win with a quarterback. He won a superbowl with Ben and went to a superbowl with Warner and very little talent elsewhere on the roster. What other coach is winning without a quarterback? More importantly, what coach has a better chance than Whiz of coming in here and winning without a quarterback? What has Horton done to make anyone believe he can win without a quarterback (or that he knows anything about how to run an offense for that matter...)?
  • Abuse
    MikeWins wrote...
    the mess he created?
    Losing sucks, but Whiz is a proven winner when he has a quarterback. No point in booting the ONLY GOOD COACH WE HAVE EVER HAD to go with an unknown...
  • Abuse
    oldie wrote...
    New it
    Been saying all week they were gonna lose and think Whiz needs to be checked out to see what he's on. This year has been a complete shanbles he needs to go no more chances he should be fired now no next week or end of season now . Let horton have it to run with . End of season get rid of all the qbs, and use the first 2 on new qbs . Start over from that at least we'll have a qb who will already have a better completion percentage than what we got now
  • Abuse
    OpinionH8d wrote...
    Whiz's Smarts?
    Because he had two good seasons with an HOF QB? Lindley's inaccuracy was so bad in the first half that I said Whiz should be fired after the game regardless of the outcome if he didn't open the second half with Skelton. And then I said it again multiple times in the second half when it was obvious the game was lost unless they gave Skelton a chance to come in and get the winning FG drive. Whiz is the most stubborn pig-headed coach with QB's this team has ever had and he does need to be FIRED!!!!
close

Share: