Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Kolb.jpg
Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Kevin Kolb, left, is sacked by Green Bay Packers linebacker Clay Matthews in the first half of the Packers' 27-20 win.(AP Photo)

It's time.

After a long search, plenty of waiting and a lot of waiting, the Arizona Cardinals will finally, officially, get their starting quarterback for the 2011 season.

And, if all indications are to be believed, the guy they get will not only be the starter this year, but for every season in the foreseeable future.

Kevin Kolb, it is thought, has the ability to be a "franchise quarterback," someone who can successfully lead a team, the type of player the Cardinals can build around.

I just wonder why.

At 26-years-old (Kolb will be 27 when the season starts) it is not as if he is incredibly young with plenty of room to grow. No, Kolb has been in the league for four seasons since being drafted in the second round out of Houston.

And, in those four years, Kolb has tossed a meager 11 touchdowns against 14 interceptions, with a completion percentage of about 61 and a yards-per-attempt average of 6.5. The first two numbers are nothing to be proud of, the latter two aren't bad. But still, not franchise-worthy.

Then again, Kolb has just seven career starts under his belt, so maybe it's the fact that he's just waiting for his chance to be some team's starting quarterback. Well, he had that chance, just one season ago. The Eagles traded Donovan McNabb to make room for Kolb who promptly got injured in the first game of the season after completing just five of 10 passes for 24 yards.

Sure, the fact that Michael Vick took over and resuscitated his career shouldn't be an indictment of Kolb's abilities, but we in the Valley witnessed a similar situation and were mostly happy to run Matt Leinart out of town. Why is it different for Kolb?

Well, from what I gather, it's out of desperation.

The Arizona Cardinals have never had a true, bona-fide franchise quarterback. Yes, Jake Plummer guided the team for six seasons, most of which we'd all like to forget. A franchise quarterback? Not quite.

Sadly, though, as as my colleague Espo points out, Arizona Cardinals history is not really filled with world-class signal callers. Besides Plummer the only other one to have any kind of success in the Valley is Kurt Warner, and his greatness only lasted for two-and-a-half seasons. Though his ability was certainly franchise QB worthy, his time at the helm was not.

So yes, the search for a true franchise quarterback has been going on for the better part of the last two decades, now reaching into its third. Is Kolb the guy? Cardinal fans hope so, and it appears the team itself wants him to be. But you can't wish Kolb into being a franchise QB; he either is or he isn't. He's done very little in his career that would make anyone think he's nothing more than a decent player, and if Kolb is not much more than what he's been the Cardinals are going to be sorely disappointed. After all, you do not trade a player like Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie and high draft picks for the right to give a big contract to someone who is probably more A.J. Feely than he is Matt Schaub.

The issue, of course, is that the very desperation that seems to be leading the Cardinals to Kolb will cause them to miss out on some pretty solid options.

Is Kyle Orton what one would consider a franchise quarterback? Not a chance. But the veteran, who is just two years older than Kolb, has already proven himself to be capable of leading a team and putting up big numbers. He'd even cost less than Kolb. But again, he's not a franchise guy, so he's not exactly an exciting prospect for some.

Matt Hasselbeck, Carson Palmer and Marc Bulger are veterans who, if they're even available, certainly wouldn't be around for more than a couple of seasons. So, while they may be effective and get the Cardinals back to the playoffs, there is no chance any of them would be a franchise QB for Arizona. Out of anyone, the only other player who could be considered a franchise QB is John Skelton, but while he may develop into a quality starting quarterback in the future there is no way last year's fifth can be counted on this season.

Then again, everyone seems as concerned with 2014 as they are 2011. While it would be great if the Cardinals could find a long-term answer at the position Tuesday, that guy just does not seem to be out there. However, there are plenty of players who would be considered a massive upgrade over Derek Anderson (you know, because they are actually NFL-caliber QBs,) and next year's draft is going to be filled with top-notch options at the position.

The Cardinals seem ready to ignore all that, instead choosing to rush into trading for a player who they hope is the long-term option, if only because they want him to be.

Unfortunately touchdowns and wins are not made out of hopes and dreams.

5 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    esc R. wrote...
    No to Kolb
    I understand why the cards want to rush into this to please Fitz and fans. I personally think they need to get this right or it will be a painful period. I don’t see franchise on Kolb at all. I see potential to be a decent QB. With the new money structure of the rookies, the cards would be wise to go get a vet who can groom a young franchise QB for the next few yrs, and spend the rest of that money on a very good O-line. Build this team up first. Trade some picks next year to move up and go after Luck, a true franchise QB.
  • Abuse
    Eric H. wrote...
    Same feelings here
    Never understood the hype behind this guy. If he was a franchise type QB he would be the starting QB for the Texans right now. Not being traded twice in his career before his 8th start.
  • Abuse
    Larry B. wrote...
    Draft Next Year Any More Secure?
    Great idea, wait until next year and draft a QB. However, where will the Cardinals be drafting? Who will be available? Who might get hurt in college this season? And most importantly, what will Larry Fitzgerald do when the Cards DON'T get a starting QB this year? I'll tell you what he'll do – try free agency. Aaron Rodgers played a good half a game before Green Bay handed him the keys. Tom Brady got on the field because Bledsoe got hurt, and he didn't have any stats either. Matt Cassel was the same. He didn't even have COLLEGE stats!
  • Abuse
    michaeljones wrote...
    Can you say Aaron Rogers?
    Don't let the Michael Vick experiment detract from the similarities between Green Bay a few years ago and Phili last year. Kolb has been groomed in an ideal situation learning behind a HOF quarterback, for a successful franchise, and in a notoriously tough division. He had the Eagles confidence on opening day. When Vick did get hurt later in the season, he more than held his own and never complained. Will he be the next Aaron Rogers? Only time will tell. Its all there for Kolb to lead the Cards to division titles and beyond.
  • Abuse
    Tony S. wrote...
    I agree with Heath R.
    I wonder if the underlying question is whether or not Fitz will walk if we don't get a QB that he is comfortable with this year. Are the Card fans willing to risk facing that situation? Or are we willing to look forward to a future possibly without Fitz?
close

Share: