I preferred Brooks. He was a better ball-handler, better scorer, better point guard and was faster. Dragic is a 2 guard in my book, his dribbling skills seriously lacks, thats why Houston didn't resign him. He's not a point guard, he's not a Russian version of Steve Nash. Personally I think that's all this signing was about, Dragic would pacify those Nash fans that are upset about Nash leaving. It's about butts in the stands, not getting better.
Houston wanted Dragic back, and they offered $40M for 4 years, and he came here for $10M less. They even said he was their number one priority in the offseason. He averaged 18 points and 8 assists per game as a starter for Houston, how are those not point guard numbers? He's also Slovenian, by the way, not Russian.
If you are going by the last time Dragic was a Sun, I'd agree with you. But clearly you did not see Dragic's run last year as a starter for Houston. It was impressive. At this point, I'd take Dragic over Brooks in a heartbeat.
at least back up your words with facts. I am tired of people like Dale (Tennisgrandpa) who blah blah blah on here and simply like to hate on the Suns. No facts, no figures just want to complain. Brooks was horrible, he couldnt score at all, he scored an average of 9 ppg while here with the suns, his best year was in houston two years ago at 19 ppg and then dropped to 11 ppg the next year. He looks timid, lost and not confident at all his assists never reached over 5 apg.