Josh Sweat active vs. Giants as he reportedly seeks new contract
Despite coming off a career year in Arizona, Cardinals pass rusher Josh Sweat has looked nothing like himself three games into the season.
Watch: What is the deal with Arizona Cardinals Josh Sweat? | 9 mins
Arizona Cardinals pass rusher Josh Sweat is officially active for his team’s Week 4 game against the New York Giants.
Sweat popped up as a limited practice participant on Friday with a groin issue.
View this post on Instagram
The pass rusher’s updated game status comes after ESPN analyst Adam Schefter’s reporting earlier in the morning that Sweat is seeking a new contract.
Sweat was among five players Schefter listed as potential trade candidates. The same goes for Cardinals wide receiver Marvin Harrison Jr.
Despite coming off a career year in 2025, Sweat has far from earned a new contract this season. Of his 55 pass rushes this year, he’s got zero sacks and three pressures.
View this post on Instagram
That kind of production does not warrant the $16.4 million cap hit he carries this year, according to OverTheCap. Only safety Budda Baker has a bigger cap hit this year at $19.2 million.
After this year, Sweat does not have any more guaranteed money on his current contract, a big reason why he likely wants a new deal.
Cardinals inactives vs. Giants
Arizona’s inactives include quarterback Carson Beck, cornerback Starling Thomas V, safety Rabbit Taylor-Demerson, linebacker Cameron Robertson, offensive lineman Josh Fryar and wide receiver Reggie Virgil.
Catch Cardinals-Giants on Arizona Sports 98.7.






Comments
1 Comments
Sweat wants a new deal less than halfway through this one? Every year, I get a little less interested in sports, and it really has to do with entitlement around these contracts. A team provides a multi-year deal to a player. This is at significant risk to the team because they're on the hook for the money (granted, I guess Sweat is running out of guarantees) regardless of what happens (hence, the Cardinals are paying Kyler to play in Minnesota). However, the idea is supposed to be that while they're taking some risk, they're securing that player at current market rate for a while. If the market goes up, the team supposedly made a good investment. However, it never works that way. If a player becomes unhappy, they just pout and "hold out" and the team is forced to do whatever they want. So, the team is always forced to hold their end of the bargain, but the player is never forced to. I would love the NFL or NBA to say to a player holding out that he is fired. He isn't kicked off the team (that's often what the player wants). He is simply fired. He refuses to hold up his end of the contract, he is out of the league and will never play again.
Similarily, I keep hearing about Katel's no trade clause and should the DBacks ask Katel's agent which teams he would be willing to be traded to. Contracts need to have contigency. They should be written in a way such that if the player simply refuses to show up to work (as Katel has done multiple years in a row), he has invalidated parts of his contract.
Why are athletes making millions of dollars not required to honor contracts? It's a spit in the face to the fans who invest in the product. Sweat makes a million dollars a game (roughly). In two games, he makes roughly $2m. A teacher making $50k a year who works for 40 years makes in a lifetime what Sweat makes in two weeks (the math isn't perfect because it fails to consider inflation and such, but close enough).
Anyway, end of rant. I just wish the leagues had the guts to fire players who refuse to honor contracts that they signed instead of coddling these egomaniacs and making everything one sided to where the team is the only side that has any risk. I have honor. If I sign a contract, I honor what I said I'd do. It's call integrity & honor.