Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Not that we have any historical basis to fall back on, but you'd think an NFL team that won its first four games and then proceeded to lose their next seven would have an unbelievable shift in statistics.

In the case of the 2012 Arizona Cardinals, the only team ever to fall into this category, that is not true.

When comparing the numbers between Arizona's four-game winning streak and their current seven-game skid, the numbers, strangely enough, look very similar in most categories.

In fact, in their last seven contests, the Cardinals are averaging more rushing yards and more passing yard per game on offense. On defense, they're allowing fewer passing yards and total yards per game.

Their turnover margin is even during the losing streak.

The overall stat sheet shows opponents are scoring more points against the Cardinals during the losing streak, but let's keep in mind that Arizona's last seven opponents have combined for four defensive touchdowns and a safety.

The Cardinals' inability to get the ball to All-Pro receiver Larry Fitzgerald more has been magnified because of their recent losing. But in actuality, Fitzgerald's production is only down less than a catch and seven yards per game in losses.

Sacks? Opponents sacked Arizona quarterbacks 3.5 times per game in wins, and 4.5 times in losses, so the difference is negligible.

The Cardinals have been abysmal at both times in converting third downs -- 30.9% in wins and 27.1% in losses.

So what is the big difference? Why has a seemingly promising season been derailed in a fashion that has many bellowing "ah, it's the same ol' Cardinals."

The answer is simple. Quarterback play.

Paul Calvisi suggested as much in a column he penned for ArizonaSports.com, and he's absolutely right. The difference for the Arizona Cardinals in wins and losses comes down to quarterback play.

Kevin Kolb is by no means a franchise quarterback, but his rib injury has absolutely crippled the Cardinals' chances of winning football games. Kolb did just enough in four contests to help Arizona win football games, including his stint in relief of John Skelton in the season opener against Seattle in which he completed six passes for 66 yards and a touchdown in the 20-16 win.

His passer rating of 86.1 won't wow anybody, but it still ranks eighth in the NFC and is ahead of the likes of Tony Romo, Eli Manning, Matthew Stafford, and Jay Cutler.

Oh, and it's much better than the figures of Skelton (64.4) and rookie Ryan Lindley (47.0), who have yet to lead the Cardinals to a win in Kolb's absence.

Over 26% of the possessions Kolb engineered ended in points, while only 24.8% of Skelton's and 16.7% of Lindley's have.

It's hard to believe, especially considering how a lot of fans thought of him after training camp, but Kevin Kolb is the most important player for the Arizona Cardinals this season.

Unfortunately, for the last seven weeks, he's been wearing a ball cap and a gray hoodie and hasn't been able to help his team on the field.

You want to know the difference between a 4-0 start and an 0-7 stretch? There's your answer right there.

9 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Midusdew wrote...
    bs
    It's Ken Whisenhunt fault. His team quits after the first half....! Then starting a 3rd string QB who has never one 1 game including preseason has set the tone for the rest of the season. I already put my seats up for sale. Wiz sucks the cardinals suck....!
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    I agree with Marotta
    I said, back when the cards were winning that Kolb was easily the most under rated QB in foot ball because, while his numbers weren't overly impressive, he was doing exactly what this team, based on the way it was built, needed to have a legitimate chance to win on any given sunday. That is, move the chains at least a little bit, and don't turn the ball over, let the Defense win games. Skelton hasn't move the chains and Lindley has hemorrhaged INTs.
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    In his defense...
    Now skelton took over when the O-line was at its worst (and was unquestionably the reason Kolb got injured, not any perceived injurie-prone trait)so I'm not certain Kolb would have done much better, or any QB in this league for that matter, but as the O-line has showed slight improvement (going from historically bad to only pretty terrible) the QB play hasn't stepped up to match it. I think part of that is on Whiz as Skelton, a historically slow starter, was pulled early in a game, and Lindley has looked like any rookie would playing behind a terrible line.
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    Final thoughts...
    So in summation, if Kolb had been made of steel and not gotten injured, do I think we'd be 10-1? Heck no. If I had to take a best guess I'd say we'd probably be 6-5. I think a healthy Kolb gives us a better chance to win right now then a healthy Skelton or Lindley, but the problems this team has run deeper then just QB and a team built the way this team is has both the ability to beat, and lose to, any team in this league on any given sunday. That said, 6-5 would still be in the running for a play off birth, 4-7 is tryouts for 2013 time.
  • Abuse
    AZSPORTFAN wrote...
    @ Vince
    Vince, I know no body agrees with me but I do think Kolb can be a franchise quarterback. Kolb actually done pretty good behind one of the worst offensive lines in NFL history. It takes two to three years for a QB to really feel comfortable or get to know his receivers and offensive scheme. You may want to look up Matt Ryan, Aaron Rogers and so-on to see how long it took them before they really became good. I hope they restructure Kolb's contract and keep him.
  • Abuse
    LiveForSports wrote...
    Hard to disagree
    Kolb made all the plays during crunch time in the first 4 games. In game 6 he got injured and Skelton blew the game in relief with a pick in OT. In Subsequent games he and Lindley have committed catastrophic turnovers that led to losses. Case closed. This team can win with Kolb playing smart or an Alex Smith type who does not turn ball over.
  • Abuse
    AZSPORTFAN wrote...
    Question
    Would Alex Smith turn the ball over or even be as accurate behind the Cardinals offensive line? Is a QB worth drafting this year, or is a good one coming up that is a free agent? I believe the answer would be no from what I have seen. I think Kolb will be a winning QB with time. I also see alot of upside with Lindley. He started out great at first with throws being as accurate as they could. Most of the throws he missed was due to blown plays on his part that will come with time.
  • Abuse
    AZSPORTFAN wrote...
    The Final Question
    Who is out there that might be better than what we already have? I'm not sure we even know what we have yet because of injuries and time.
  • Abuse
    Rainex80 wrote...
    ...
    We can stop with the offensive line excuses. The past few weeks they have actually stepped up. Now its on Ken and the QB's...Youre up 13-0 and you pull your starter, yet when youre losing a close game and Lindley isnt even CLOSE to completing a freakin pass....just keep putting him out there. Someone is fired this week. Doesnt get much worse than this offensively. I'll put money on it.
close

Share: